Tomorrow I return to my spouse's kampung after spending nearly seven months in my kampung. Our abode is in the Midlands, in Leicester where our very dear friends live though some have died.
He's a very lucky Scotsman, my spouse. The land of his forefathers is still there, intact and safe though that security did not come easy.
This line marks the pride of the Scottish: I have withstood the shock of England, of Denmark, of Rome and the world.
I so wish my Tanah Air could have reclaimed her dignity and pride after the shock of Portugal, of Holland, of Britain and the rest of the world claiming stakes and the resources of my Tanah Pusaka.
But this we have in common. The people of Scotland can sing with pride : The eyes of my sons , their bright swords are glancing. Triumphantly riding through ruin and death.
Our Police Force and our Armed Forces have done the same, like Lieutenant Adnan from the Malay Regiment who sacrificed his life and that of his brave comrades in holding back the Japanese in Singapore in February 1942.
But the Scots were proud of their sons and celebrated and remembered their sacrifice : Bold hearts and nodding plumes wave over their bloody tombs.
Malaysia was also proud of our sons, who gave up their lives during the Communist Insurgency so that the future generation could live in peace and prosperity. The nation remembers them each year , remembering those who did not come home :
Alas the Malaysian Rakyat of today, led chiefly by the 22.6 % cohort (see AsH's posting on 27 October 2019) of Malaysia's Anak and Bangsa Malaysia have decided to spit on their tombstones instead; when the ashes of the "Great Leader" of the Communist Insurrection were brought back surreptitiously into Malaysia in defiance of the law and the heartbeat of the Nation. While the Scots can sing with pride Scotland the Brave, these Malaysians who come from all levels of society, including our Leadership should hang their heads in shame. What cowards and ingrates!
In 1967, when I graduated from Singapore University, my Abah advised me to "balek" to Malaya to his and my Tanah Pusaka. But I did not heed his counsel. Finally, forty seven years later I realised where I really belonged.
But since 2009 when I finally received my Kad Pengenalan (after 5 years of waiting) almost everything that my Abah and I held dear in our Tanah Pusaka have been battered and torn by the shameful politicking and misguided and self-serving politicisation of race and rights.
"Every nation gets the government it deserves" (Joseph de Maistre).
However the inhabitants and government of Malaysia do not deserve this generous and bountiful Tanah Pusaka .
Who will find the parang kontot and slay the burong hantu, shaitan and hantu jembalang?
In his inimitable way, P. Ramlee has brilliantly described the fate of this country.
Celaka punya penyamun, Sial! Bikin rosak ana punya programme.
Buah amra masak bergetah, Baharu na'mengkal gugor sendiri. "Di pechah2 lalu perentah" Itu - lah 'akal pena'alok negeri. (From Kalong Bunga, Buku 1 oleh Za'ba)
Yesterday the husband of " Elizabeth II, by the grace of God, of the United Kingdom ........... Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith " i.e. the Christian Faith, was involved in a bad accident.
Worries and prayers were expressed by the Ugandan-born Bishop of York, Bishop John Tucker Mugabi Sentamu.
Perhaps if Malaysia (old or new) had a Christian Royalty, some of her rakyat and elite might be a tad more respectful, tolerant, understanding and accommodating towards having a "Yang di Pertuan Agong" as Head of State. Let's take more steps backwards - to more than 61 years ago , to just about 65.
Note the unctuous deference to the British Queen in pre-independence Malaya, specifically 1953.
Supplicants from Penang
And by the way, that loyal and humble subject Dr Lee Tiang Keng plotted secession for Penang to break away from the Persekutuan Tanah Melayu (Federation of Malaya) and join forces with Singapore - why kowtow to Malay Sultans?
As for Singapore:
Looking at the non-white membership of the Singapore Legislative Council, no wonder my Chinese fellow undergrads at Singapore University mocked the title of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong.
Ash's experience at Singapore University from the early to mid-1960s.
So, this contempt for the institution of the Malay monarchy has a long, long pedigree. People like Eric Liew and Richard Chung and countless others are simply carrying on with the tradition of their forefathers.
Insults and jibes at Malay institutions, religion, culture and all things Malay will never end especially from the likes of highly educated and well heeled "Bangsa Malaysia" ......
..... who contributed his thoughtfully reasoned analysis (after all, he's a university graduate) on the Agong's resignation. I see no need for me to repeat his masterpiece.
Besides all the others - Malays and non-Malays - baying at this Institution of Monarchy, we have the classic, oft-repeated pecuniary rationale of "we pay the most tax, so we have the greater say!".
Perhaps Eric and Richard and all those of their ilk might ponder on the price we pay to be a Rakyat of Malaysia. Bishop John Sentamu for example, demonstrated and expressed his loyalty and gratitude to the country that gave him succour and security and citizenship
There are after all, many other Malaysians who have made "contributions" and paid a different price for sustaining the well-being of Malaysia.
" The ethnic profile of police officers has been traditionally disproportionate compared to the national ethnic profile with a significantly higher proportion of ethnic Malays especially in the earlier decades. However the number of casualties involving ethnic Malay police officers are statistically higher overall due in part to the high mortality rates involving the ethnic Malay community during the Malayan emergency in the 1950-1970s, and in part to the ethnic composition of the police force."
From the above Table, the Malays paid in 1,016, the Chinese 98, the Indians 27 and the Eurasians 69 - LIVES, not ringgit and cents.
You could say that those members of "Bangsa Malaysia" who eventually became today's high-rate taxpayers were given the luxury/opportunity to study, work and prosper in peace because the Malays were protecting their rice bowl.
Enough's said.
So, we can look forward to a new Malaysia pledging to undo all the mismanagement and miscreants of old Malaysia. The past 61 years have been rubbished.
But let's learn from an old Malay poem.
CHERITA SI KATAK PELAHAP
Dahan ! Dahan ! kenapa bengkok ? Sebab terhinggap burong. Burong ! Burong ! sebab apa hinggap dahan?
Hendak melihat ikan timbul.
Ikan ! Ikan ! kenapa timbul? Sebab ada lembu masok sungai. Lembu ! Lembu ! kenapa masok sungai ? Sebab ada orang memukul. Orang ! orang ! kenapa di-pukul lembu? Sebab lapar, hendak makan nasi. Nasi ! nasi ! kenapa engkau mentah? Sebab api tidak bernyala. Api ! api ! kenapa tidak bernyala ? Sebab kayu habis basah. Kayu ! kayu ! kenapa habis basah ? Sebab di-timpa hujan. Hujan ! hujan ! kenapa engkau turun ? Sebab di-panggil katak. Katak ! katak ! kenapa sudah memanggil ? Sebab haus berkehendakkan ayer. KATAK CHELAKA ! BUKAN - KAH CHUKUP AYER MINUM DALAM PERIGI DI-BAWAH POKOK ?
The bough (dahan) of this Malaysia will remain bent and crooked because the country still embraces the incompetent, stupid, arrogant and nefarious birds, fish,cows, humans, fire, firewood, rain and most of all, the cursed voracious frogs.
We are now in Malaysia Baru, and the stench of the "odious and odorous" (Shakespeare's words) Malayan Union is beginning to waft in through the windows of our days. Besides the puerile attempts at marginalising the National Language (Bahasa Kebangsaan, aka Bahasa Malaysia aka Bahasa Melayu) there are whispers and self-righteous bleatings about questioning and controlling the validity of the Monarchy in Malaysia under the guise of transparency and combating corruption.
This we can see recently in .......... The Cynthia and Steven Show
Uber Liberal Government Minister demanding a 'transparent' Monarchy.
For comparison, no BBC (British-born Chinese), even if (and especially if) he is a Government Minister, would dare pronounce that the British Monarchy should be more transparent.
No ABC (Australian born Chinese) or New Zealand born Chinese would dare suggest that their Head of State, the Queen of England, be subjected to scrutiny and assessments of their persons, their Royal Purse and Royal expenses.
As for Cynthia and Steven, if they were holding British, or Australian, or New Zealand or even Canadian Passports they wouldn't even have the guts to show the top of their heads over the parapet and yell "the Royal Family should be subjected to scrutiny by the forces against corruption and cronyism"!!!
Our Disroyal Minister of Yoof more or less, with pointing finger, told our rulers "This was the direction taken by the country" and you have no choice. When and who decided that this would be the Country's Direction? Was this in the Manifesto of Pakatan Baru? Was this part of the 100-days' promise?
Well let's put across a couple of straight facts to the questioner in that Forum, the YAB Yoof Minister and Cynthia Gabriel, from the Centre to Combat Corruption and Cronyism (C4) and others of their ilk.
C4's crusader, Cynthia Gabriel.
The latter sounded out her crusade-
From "Raja-Raja Melayu Open to Criticism Says Pakatan Harapan" - Malaysia Today, 25 Sept 2018.
Here are several aspects of the Malay Sultanate system that our Anak/Bangsa Malaysia may not be aware of.
There is no room in the Semenanjung for Republican heroes (and agitators) like Dr Sun Yat-sen, founder and father of the Republic of China who took up cudgels against the Qing Dynasty in 1912.
For those among the Anak/Bangsa Malaysia who aspire to take on the robes and ideas of Dr Sun Yat-sen, they should be aware that as a Chinese Nationalist, Dr Sun was bringing down not only an Emperor but even more, a non-Chinese Dynasty and a "Tartar barbarian" who had ruled over the Han Chinese for 268 years.
Dr Sun's drive for financial support from the Overseas Chinese in the Semenanjung and Penang and Singapore at the turn of the 20th Century was pretty successful. He was very much revered in our part of the world.
From Wikipedia.
As the above is not clear enough, I have re-written this below.
"In George Town, Penang, Malaysia, the Penang Philomatic Union had its premises at 120 Armenian Street in 1910 during the time when Sun spent more than four months in Penang, convened the historic "Penang Conference" to launch the fundraising campaign for the Huanghuagang Uprising and founded the Kwong Wah Yit Poh, this house, which has been preserved as the Sun Yat-sen Museum (formerly called the Sun Yat Sen Penang Base), was visited by President designate Hu Jintao in 2002. The Penang Philomatic Union subsequently moved to a bungalow at 65 Macalister Road which has been preserved as the Sun Yat-sen Memorial Centre Penang.
As dedication, the 1966 Chinese Cultural Renaissance was launched on Sun's birthday on 12 November.
The Nanyang Wan Qing Yuan in Singapore have since been preserved and renamed as the Sun Yat Sen Nanyang Memorial Hall. A Sun Yat Sen heritage trail was also launched on 20 November 2010 in Penang."
Coming back to the Semenanjung: any desire, suggestion and/or policy for a replication of Dr Sun's successful overthrow of the Monarchy in China or even to fiddle and muck about - and treat with contempt a Malay Institution and Heritage will be met with appropriate opposition. Malay Sultans are not descendants from any line outside of the Gugusan Kepulauan Melayu (Malay Archipelago) .......
...... or from any 'XYZ barbarian' (like the Dynasty overthrown by Sun Yat-sen) - at least not in the eyes of the Orang Melayu.
The Sultan and Sultanate system were well established long before the coming of Francis Light in Penang and Stamford Raffles in Singapore. As for the Malacca Sultanate, it was a strong commercial and political entity in the Archipelago before it was smashed (by sheer firepower and a bit of treachery in Melaka) by Catholic Portugal. The Melaka Sultanate (before the invasion from Europeans) was an acknowledged centre of Malay commercial and political power and relations with China were relations of mutual respect.
In Malaysia, one cannot say that the Sultans and the Sultanate system is peculiar only to the Malays However, in this multi-racial country, there are some who feel that the Monarchy in Malaysia is as alien to them as the Qing Dynasty to the Han Chinese. There are also some others who feel more culturally attuned to British Royalty like during the period before 1957.
But, for these disroyal Malaysians, Kings and Emperors and Maharajahs have been embedded in their culture, heritage and history for centuries Here are some of them ......
In the history of Malaya, Francis Light and Stamford Raffles did not simply arrive and 'founded' Penang and Singapore - they had to seek permission from the Sultan of Kedah and the Sultan of Singapore respectively. To be more realistic the two Sultans were tricked, threatened and persuaded to sign the dotted line. In this context, I hope our Anak/Bangsa Malaysia will recognise the place of the Sultan and the Sultanate system in the history of Malaya/Malaysia. They are as relevant and valid as Queen Elizabeth II and all her ancestors from when we were still part of the British Empire!
With the acquisition of Melaka and especially Penang and Singapore the British supervised and encouraged massive immigration from China, India and Ceylon to 'develop' their three imperial entities which were later integrated into the Straits Settlements.
But planting and trading in gambier and pepper and other exotic jungle products were not enough to feed the appetite and fill the coffers of the the British Empire and the coloniser-settlers. I have earlier written about how the discovery of oil became a curse in the Middle East when it became a battle ground for competing western interests in the exploitation and control of oil. Similarly, the occurrence of rich deposits of cassiterite (tin) in the Malay states of the Semenanjung - especially Perak and Selangor - turned into a scourge for the Malays.
Before British "intervention", every state in the Semenanjung had a ruler (or sometimes two competing rulers) - a Malay-Muslim Sultan with all the trappings of a bona fide state - a free (in terms of security from control and conquest) and independent entity. It may have lacked the niceties of a 'civilised' western state because of practices like "slavery" (still legal in Britain when Raffles arrived) and with much to be desired in terms of law and order (as in contemporary Britain) - but still a state with a Sultan that had to be reckoned with in any attempts to cross their territory. If the Malays had not have this 'backup' we might have found ourselves like this at the hands of the British and the settlers: (See image below)
A tragic treatment of Australian Aborigines by white Australian colonial-settlers. This could have been the fate of the Malays if the Malay States in the Peninsula were leader-less with no established system of authority to represent them.
The Pangkor Treaty of 1874 marked a watershed in the history of the Melayu and the Semenanjung - when the British legitimised their domination of the affairs of the Malay states. In other words, British Imperialism and all its perfidious ways and purposes now held sway over much of the Malay Peninsula and its resources. The Malay Peninsula was now wide open for greater 'development' and exploitation by the British and the businessmen (both European and Chinese) from Penang and Singapore.
One could say the supplication exhibited in this Petition by Chinese traders and merchants was the Pandora's Box that opened the door for unremitting commercialization of what was basically a subsistence peasant economy.
Note the homage to the Monarch - Empress Victoria - "our Most Gracious Majesty the Queen". This petition was submitted in 1873 and despite protestations of reluctance by the British, the Pangkor Treaty was delivered the following year. Eradicating piracy and "the lawless and turbulent" have always been the most popular reasons for subjugating a people, for Imperialism and the Empire.
Pax Britannica would let loose the hounds of Capitalism and Mercantilism into this bountiful land. The Malays, hit by this onrush of 'diligence and entrepreneurship' from forces led by the omnipotent Orang Putih, remained in a state of semi-torpor as the jungles were slashed away, as the valleys were scraped and flooded for tin mining, as the rivers were polluted with the entrails of dredging and palong mining, and as towns and roads and rail began to criss-cross the land. We have this quote from L.A.Mills (British Malaya 1824-1867, JMBRAS 1960), pg 251)
After tin, along came rubber and other forms of commercial and plantation cropping. The wheels of a lop-sided and inequitable progress rolled on and on. "Progress" under the Union Jack; aided by the hardworking and enterprising immigrants ........
became, in the words of E.E. Cummings a "comfortable disease". Today this "advance" festers in the Malay psyche as a malady, an ailment caused by too much comfort and ease. They have been seduced and corrupted by the propitious "bread and circus", by this palliative drug which keeps them quiet - but which also turns them into avid consumers of goods they do not need and cannot afford and worse of all, of excessive 'exotic' food that consumes their health.
This is all you need to know about the Malays (and other Malayans), according to a Colonialist in 1911.
Again and again Malays have been castigated as lazy, unreliable and indolent. We cannot expect anything different from our non-Malay fellow-rakyat and their mentors like the late Mr Lee Kuan Yew from Singapore. When said often enough especially by our own brethren, we begin to believe and even live it as it becomes almost a self-fulfilling prophecy. They are the same abuses and brickbats that are thrown at dispossessed people like the Maoris in New Zealand, native Indians of North and South America, the American Blacks in the USA and the Australian Aborigines.
When some time ago, Tun Dr Mahathir described Malaysia as a "pariah state", it needs to be remembered that it did not just happen to occur during the early decades of the 21st century. It had its beginnings with the Pangkor Treaty in 1874. But we must also remember to differentiate between the "pariah-er" ..... and the "pariah-rised".
After 1874, the British wasted no time extending their clutches. Twenty-one years later, in 1895, the Malay Sultans were rounded up into the Federated Malay States (FMS).
Note the absence of the business moghuls and entrepreneurs. They must be too busy setting and moving the wheels of progress under the patronage and protective umbrella of the British 'Raj'.
In 1909 the Sultanates of Kelantan, Trengganu, Perlis and Kedah were ceded to the British by Siam.
In 1914, the Sultan of Johore 'accepted' a British adviser.
In 1946, all the above territories, except Singapore, were 'united' in the infamous Malayan Union.
This was the formal imposition of British colonial power over all of the Malay Peninsula, including Penang according to their template which sought to protect their chosen compradores. The British gathered all the Malay rulers to "get their approval" . Under pain of dethronement and accusations of being collaborators during the Japanese Occupation, the Malay Rulers caved in. ONLY the Malays protested and took to demonstrations to denounce the theft of their rights in their country, their sovereignty and the abolition of their Monarchs.
For once, and at last, (and sadly, maybe for the last time,) the Malay Worm decided to turn. The rest is history. Alas, history has a habit of repeating itself !!
Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it. George Santayana 1863-1952.
But here is something more sinister from George Orwell.
He who controls the past controls the future. He who controls the present controls the past. **********************
Malaysia is composed of various races. They are diverse - and as different as chalk and cheese. Let's not deceive ourselves into thinking that stark racial and economic differences do not exist and do not matter, that we can over-ride this by inventing such a misnomer as Bangsa Malaysia.
Those who take pride in being rakyat Malaysia have to learn and relearn how to respect and not merely tolerate one another. Manufacturing new wine and pouring that into new bottles is not the solution. "How do you prove your loyalty to Singapore?" asked a Singapore Minister. The willingness to die for your country is one yardstick. It does not imply the blind faith of "my country right or wrong" But at the very least one should be able to declare a statement of loyalty: that .......
Dimana bumi dipijak, disitu langit ku junjung.
Inscribed into that saying is the element of respect.
The composition and mix of Malaysia's population is hardly of the Malays' making, maybe with the exception of independent Johore, which was spared the imposition of a British Resident until 1914. The imbalances, the disparities, the almost institutionalised income gap in the Semenanjung between the Malays and the non-Malays, between the urban and rural inhabitants and even between states on the east coast and the west coast have been long-standing and quite unacceptable. Admittedly some advances have been made ....
Mean Monthly Gross Household Income by Ethnicity and Strata.
..... but the gap and the rate of growth is not very inspiring.
One factor not included in the above table is the growing gap between rich and poor Malaysians across the board, notwithstanding their ethnicity. We glorify our rich, their takings and lifestyle and their influence but we do so at our peril if we ignore Anuar, Ah Heng , James (from East Malaysia) and Maniam who live from day to day and from hand to mouth and struggle to make ends meet in this land of plenty.
The British and many of us too, regaled the legacy of the Empire in terms of the practice of democracy, the roads and railways and schools and the Civil Service. But these were not done out of altruism - but to serve and service the wants and needs of the Empire. They left more or less the same legacy in Uganda and South Africa but we know too well what took place as soon as the Union Jack was lowered. Idi Amin kicked out the Indians and because of their passport the British had to reluctantly take them in, instead of an India that didn't want them, and which they didn't want. In South Africa, apartheid and the gross inequality between the White settlers and the native Blacks almost tore the country apart.
Malaya was more fortunate but what the British left behind became ingredients for the sustenance of systemised inequalities which eventually culminated in the racial riots of May 13th 1969, twelve years after Merdeka. It is to the credit of the leaders and the people of Malaysia that they eventually made good despite the critical imbalance of demography, economics and politics. Here, the role and contributions of the Monarchy need to be recognised. Although the then Sultans (who were the only symbols of authority for the Malays) had been stripped of most of their power by the British (except for religion), they kept their cool and dignity by refraining from interfering in the workings of the elected government - they took no part in menangguk di ayer yang keroh during the dark days following May 13 and they reached out to all their rakyat in their own states. The denigration accorded to the Monarchy by our wannabe Republicans is often linked with feudalism and its excesses from the 19th to the 20th century. However, feudalism is still rampant today -a feudalism based on wealth; a sort of Secular-Corporate Feudal System. It also has its Kings; as in the Raja beras, Raja minyak masak, Raja kapal terbang, Raja media, Raja gula, Raja resort pelancung, Raja talipon, Raja kreta mewah, Raja 'bread and butter' kreta, Raja hartanah, Raja tabung duit, Raja kelapa sawit, Raja kayu balak, Raja minyak petrol and many other shades and shapes of Raja, Maharaja, Emperors and Sultans in our corporate-feudal world.
As for the "serfs", they are now better educated and relatively better off than they were during the old serfdom but they still carry on with the same bowing and scraping and the age-old baksheesh, the same old nudge, nudge, wink wink in business, and the kamcheng ideology is as strong and potent as ever. Now that the old regime of feudal lords are showing signs of decrepitude and slowly losing their bite to the new lords of the universe in Malaysia, it has become a good time to put the nail in their coffins. But first we have to remove all their teeth. Viva the Revolution for a Malayan Union Baru, Malaysia Baru, Rakyat Baru, Bahasa Kebangsaan (tambahan ) Baru. and a Malaysian Malaysia Baru.
The last item is a re-incarnation of the mantra flung about during the 5 week campaign period before the General Election of 8 March 1969. This was followed soon after by the Race Riots in May. The dam walls had been breached, the camel's back had been broken.
A Banner floating around Kuala Lumpur in February/March 1969. This mantra in KL was a keynote agenda of the Singapore PAP when it was still a member state in Malaysia. Singapore was ejected in 1965. But its message was handed over to the DAP, a creation and clone of the PAP.
History, according to some of the millenials and generation X, should be re-scripted, especially that of the Communist Party of Malaya and the Insurrection. If that is the one focus of history that matters to them, it's a dreadful comment on their understanding of history and its analysis. Whatever the approach they wish to emphasise, they must know that theirs is not the only and valid perception. If they are so committed to elevating LCP to a Freedom fighter and the Malayan (Chinese) Communist party as a harbinger of independence in the Peninsula, then I suggest they firstly have to remove their Che Guevara berets and review the history of that period with that of Kuomintang China, the Sino-Japanese War of 1937, the Marxist-Leninist revolution in Russia, North Korea and China (CCP), the beginning of The Cold War in the western world, the development of Malay nationalism after 1946 and the call for independence in all the colonised nations in Southeast Asia and India. Then, after that, place LCP and the MCP in the middle of that scenario. How short-sighted and myopic their view of their own country - and of the whole gamut of the history of a country ridden with conflicts of race, religion, and economic inequality, and still laden with the baggage of having been part of the British Empire for well over a hundred years.
May I, as an "Orang Melayu" (whose father was a Civilian Instructor in the RAMC during the Emergency/Insurrection by the MCP), add another aspect of history to be re-assessed - that leading up to the Treaty of Pangkor and the repercussions of that Treaty? This will require a drastic overhaul of the script written by Western and local academics - from today and over a century ago.
An understanding of the Semenanjung's and Malaysian history does not depend entirely on the books available. The cultural background of the observer /reader also comes into play. This also determines and hinges on where they decide to situate their reference point. For some the Pangkor Treaty was the keynote:
"When the British flag is seen over Perak and Larut, every Chinaman will go down on his knees and bless God." quote by Headman of a Kongsi in Perak. (in Mills, 1960)
But the history of Malaya/Malaysia did not begin with the Pangkor Treaty, or with the wider sweep of the British Empire.
The pre-colonial history of the Malay Peninsula before the arrival of Christian Britain and Europeans has precedence and greater relevance especially for the Native Malay. For that was also the history of the rise and fall and power struggles of the riverine and coastal chieftains and Sultans, of sultanates and their allies and enemies, the history of their administration and trade and commerce, the history of their religion and culture from the time of Hindu Srivijaya and especially the history of their Rakyat. All these strands of history define the distinct identity of the Selangor Malay, the Perak Malay, the Kedah Malay, the Pahang Malay and so on .... and these same strands of history also assert the fact that these are a people who are Serumpun.
The Malays, like the Europeans, British, Chinese and Indians have a history built around their Monarchs and their landscape. No one, but no one has the right to demonstrate contempt or to evict them either by force or by law. They are the monarchs of the Malay Peninsula and represent the heritage and defender of the rights of the Malay people and will remain so unless they act against the will of their Malay Rakyat. But it is not simply the person or the Sultan per se that the Malay people are protecting. Rather it is the institution that they want to uphold and maintain - and they will not condone any etching or chipping away of this precious Malay Institution.
By analogy, I remember one of my School Principals in Singapore. I had had enough of him. He was an ambitious user of people and a hypocrite to boot. As a bigot he won first prize. But he represented the institution of the headmaster, the leader of the school and all the teachers and students in it. So I did the job as ascertained by him even though I despised him, the person. More crucial than his despicable person, my students and colleagues took precedence over him. It would have turned out well if he had been replaced. But the institution of the School Principal and the Headmaster had to remain intact.
I am aware that Cynthia and Steven will protest that they are not choosing to get rid of the Monarchy. They would be bonkers to attempt to do that. But the constant bitching, velvet-glove threats and the smug, self-righteous snipes in the name of "transparency" and "freedom" would eventually scrape and weaken the edifice of a Malay Institution and eventually reach the stage where it becomes Retak menanti Belah.
My working class mates in Leicester had a colourful way of asserting their heritage and history, warts and all. "They may be bastards. But they are OUR bastards. So, lay off, mate!"
That is why no BBC or British Asian will dare to challenge and demean the British Monarchy.
Shall I summarise this in the words of the Penang boatman (in the article above by Mills)? "Empress good: coolie get money - keep it."
There are various permutations to this quip :
"Empress good.Coolie get and keep money?" or "Empress good. Coolie keep Empress and money?" or "Coolie keep Empress when coolie and not Empress get money." or "Now coolie get many money. Empress now no good and must go."
Parliament is not a congress of ambassadors from different and hostile interests; which interests each must maintain, as an agent and advocate, against other agents and advocates; but parliament is a deliberative assembly of one nation, with one interest, that of the whole; where, not local purposes, not local prejudices ought to guide, but the general good, resulting from the general reason of the whole. Edmund Burke 1729-1797
What a sterling statement from one of Britain's foremost political philosophers! What a perfect achievement for any Parliament.
We have to aim to achieve the very highest (and toughest) principles of life and living. When we fail or fall, we shall not descend into the deplorable bottom of the pit, but maybe just halfway down so that we will be able to claw our way back and enable us to reach some sort of redemption. Perfection is an excellent objective but to assert that one's principles and practice are perfect is almost like claiming divinity.
Just as I prefer to be a pessoptomist - a pessimistic optimist - I stand by this vision of perfection by Shakespeare,
I saw her once Hop forty paces through the public street; And having lost her breath, she spoke, and panted That she did make defect perfection, And, breathless, power breathe forth.
We have to live with defects in our Parliament, in our leaders and especially in one very major frailty: that Malaysia as one nation and one interest is sadly and badly lacking "the general good, resulting from the general reason of the whole". Unlike the nations of Europe (including Britain), and even Japan and China to a certain extent, we were manipulated and overpowered by the political, religious and economic ambitions of the Judaeo-Christian West. Our history and geography, culture and economy were manufactured by others. Southeast Asia and Nusantara became the proverbial Goose that laid the Golden Egg although in this case the Goose was not killed but allowed to keep on laying the golden eggs - thus maintaining the profitability of their enterprise.
The defects in our practice of Parliamentary Democracy are no different from any other country. But Malaysia, unlike most other countries has a legacy and a structure that is not of our making. Malaysia is made up of many dissimilar factions who, under the British, were allocated very differing and discordant parts to fit into the Empire's pocket. Under such a condition, it is almost impossible to create an " assembly of one nation, with one interest". It is like dealing with and living in an arranged and loveless marriage. You have to put up with it and hope for some kind of rapprochement and peaceful co-existence, provided no third party comes into the equation.
If oil is a curse on the Middle East, then the rich (now completely exhausted and depleted) deposits of tin in Perak and Selangor, together with the Peninsula's easy accessibility between East and West have been the bane of the Malay Peninsula's existence.
The Malay Peninsula, a finger-like southeastern extension of the Asian Continent, caught in the grasp of the Occident and the Orient.
Since 1957, the Federation of Malaya and later as Malaysia, has committed itself to the institution of rule by Parliament - of conducting General and Local Elections every few years. There have been many brickbats, thrown at Malaysia from both home-grown and foreign sources about the integrity of the election and the elected government. GE14 like GE13 will demonstrate the same back-stabbing, dirty tactics, cheap racist innuendos and shifty debates to win over the hearts and minds of the electorate. Our political parties are quite adept in pandering to the lowest common denominator in our political psyche - particularly on the issues of race and riches.
The run-up to GE 14 will promise a great deal of political theatrics and pageantry. How shall a pessoptomistic septuagenarian cope?
I suppose I shall have to turn to Aesop and Sam. We are all familiar with Aesop.
As for Sam .....
I reckon (when he was younger in the 1990s) he was not the sort of young man you would take home to meet your mater and pater who dwell in Kelburn, Wellington New Zealand, or Bangsar, Kuala Lumpur, or Tanglin, Singapore or Hampstead Heath, London.
But as he is our Kiwi nephew we have taken him into our home in Leicester and Setiawangsa. As you know, blood is thicker than water or even flat beer.
Sam (left) and his doppelganger, actually his twin brother Joe in the late 1980s.
In the picture above, Sam and Joe looked very bolshie and serious. Sam had just returned from his anti-apartheid occupations and demonstrations in Wellington. Joe is a skilful kayaker and used his hobby to harass the American warships that prowl the waters off New Zealand in the late 1980s. In fact a few months after this picture was taken, Sam was badly beaten up by the police during an anti-apartheid demonstration in Wellington. His right eye was permanently damaged but his commitment was left intact.
Sam spent his compensation backpacking in Pommie Land, Europe, the Middle East and continental Southeast Asia.
Sam's Journey
When I was rummaging through the stuff I needed for this posting, I read once again after nearly 30 years Sam's postcard and I felt a lump in my throat.
Sam's Syria, thirty years ago.
Today, Syria has been bludgeoned back to the Stone Age because it was successfully and adamantly minding its own business - keeping the Americans and British and Israel and Saudi Arabia at bay.
When Sam Buchanan came home he decided to paddle his feet in the world of politics. He became the candidate for McGillicuddy Serious Party for Kapiti. Here's the write-up for McG.S.P. in the local paper Kapiti Observer.
Exposing the Political Sham by Sam.
This is how this geriatric shall attempt to get through this GE 14 election fever with the aid of Aesop and Sam.
Aesop said :
Beware of joining forces with those who promise salvation and safety.
In the matter of making choices, Sam reminded voters that in "every election .... the ordinary citizen has always lost". Politicians always win.
Aesop also wrote :
Beware of the motives of politicians says Sam.
Aesop often used animals to refer to the self-serving nature of man, which I think is an insult to the innocent animals. Take this fable.
Who can learn a lesson from this parable?
Belacan Malays
Mandi Malays
Masala Malays
Mayonnaise Malays
The whole caboodle
Finally when this GE 14 is over I can imagine this scenario - a panoply of recriminations, complaints, squabbles and the 'only-in-Malaysia' tantrums! This is how Aesop would describe it.
To sore losers and Travellers like these, me ole mum would say :
Hujan emas dinegeri orang, hujan batu dinegeri sendiri. Dimana bumi dipijak, disitu langit ku junjung. And so, on 9 May 2018, vote wisely Malaysia. Vote with this hope in mind - "one nation, with one interest, that of the whole; where not local purposes, not local prejudices ought to guide, but the general good ..."
And please do not denigrate the Plane Tree or take it for granted!!
The spoken language , in its various intonations, will immediately signal to you the nature and sincerity of a statement.
For instance, after committing an error you can respond orally with
' I'm sorry' (and I do mean it with all my heart) or
'sorry?' ( did I really offend you?), or
'sorry!?' (I apologise but I don't see why I should),
'sorrryyyy' ( I am not, but I'm coooool!), or
at the very worst you will receive 'sorry xz?w8hjfk!;!!!!!!!!' (fill in the blanks yourself).
However, any form of written text is a bit more complex to dissect, to tweak out the hidden deception and half-truths - to look beyond the denotations of language to the connotation. And of course the insertion and placing of images in the text and layout of any print and electronic media can be used as a subtle and clever type of innuendo and insinuation.
The Star for example, which prides itself on being .....
,,,,,,,, was recently caught - with its 'kn.....rs in a twist' ( not the first time though) with this front page "scoop" .
It could only lead to the inevitable anger and disgust from the Malay-Muslims ( the bumiputra and 61.3 percent of the population). Conflating terrorism with an image of Muslims at prayer is quite unforgivable and cannot be anything else but mischievous. The management and editors at all levels of authority in The Star cannot claim that it's due to ignorance or an innocent 'coincidence'.
The pathetic and self-serving apology that followed made matters worse.
And so, after that headline and the limp apology, can we declare "Three strikes and you're out!!" ?
How pathetic is this sorry state of an 'explanation' ?
Paragraph 3: Nobody but a cretin would not link the message and intent of the headline and the picture. Do the powers-that-be in The Star think so little of the Malaysian public's ability to assess the carelessness and callousness of the design of that front page? You don't need a degree to recognize the malice, whether it's intended or not.
This reminds me of the excuses put forward by the owner of Ninja Joe P. Ramly Burger when he was brought to task by the owners of Ramly Burger.
So, 'P' stands for pork in Ninja Joe's P. Ramly burger!! What a porkie! Or maybe this is just an unfortunate coincidence - a similar plight to The Star.
Paragraph 4: "The Star should be more discerning and sensitive to the feelings of our Muslim readers".
What an unfortunate oversight! Or was it?
Let's take this scenario.
Would some of The Star's readers be irate if this collage appears on the front page of "Malaysia's No 1 Local English News Portal".
An in-your-face Combi-Image
*********************************************************************** Notes for the above Combi-Image The top image comes from www.chinadaily.com.cn/business/2012-02/03/content_15781890.htm Here's an extract from the third image at the bottom. " The urban areas - especially the capital Kuala Lumpur ......... George Town, Malacca and Petaling Jaya enjoy a quality of living very similar to that in developed countries. However incomes are still distributed unevenly. For instance the wealthiest 20% of Malaysians control 53.8 per cent of the wealth while the poorest 60 per cent of the population controls just 21.3 per cent. .............. Disparities exist along both geographic and ethnic lines. In general, the Chinese population, which traditionally lived in urban areas and been involved in small and medium-sized businesses or employed in various industries has had higher incomes than the Malays,who often live in small towns and villages and were traditionally engaged in agriculture. .......... Peninsular Malaysia, where the majority of the population lives, has much higher standards of living compared to East Malaysia."
Being discerning and respectful of people's sensitivities has always been a commendable trait in this country that gave shelter and sustenance to those who came to her shores for the last 250 years. But standards of respect for our differences have fallen drastically - thanks to the Internet, Twitter and Facebook which allow neanderthals and cowards to flaunt their bigotry and double standards.
I recall these recriminatory words from Dato Seri Wong Chun Wai, Group Chief Editor of The Star in his column when he challenged the rantings of a Malay racist group.
In the fourth paragraph of his column, Dato Seri Wong wrote " Obviously, it needs to be reminded that under the definition of sedition and seditious tendency in our legislation, anything uttered which upsets a group of people along racial or religious lines is seditious. The term may be broad but that's how it goes, people. "
Exactly! That's how it goes Malaysians!! Especially when and if you believe that "you belong to Malaysia" and not the proprietorial "Malaysia belongs to us/me".
********************
Finally, here's an item from the venerable New York Times which is very similar to The Star's star headline.
1. A few days ago I came across this article in The Guardian which complements the issues that arose from The Star's 'unfortunate coincidence' of May 27. Extracts from the article will do a better job at making a comparative analysis of the journalistic style of The New York Times and The Star.
'Deliberate choices' in the name of the much-vaunted freedom of the Press
2.
With apologies for the poor image.
News about lies and robbery committed by white swimmers representing USA during Rio 2016 (compare with Malaysian terrorist leaders in The Star) was conflated with that of Usain Bolt's remarkable victory at Rio 2016 (compare with image of Malaysian Muslims at Terawih prayers in The Star).
Our favourite betes noir: Islam/Muslims and Blacks
3.
.... or Prejudice and Pride?
4.
Reading between and beyond the Lines and Images
A B C keladi hutan, Nasi basi jangan di makan A B C keladi kangkung, Tanggal gusi pipi kempong A B C gula arak, Aku makan isi, engkau makan kerak Jinjing-jinjing tikus, Pekasam labi-labi Anjing sudah kurus Malam2 masok babi. (From Kalong Bunga, Buku 1, oleh Za'ba, DBP 1964)
